Przeglądaj wg Autor "Nosowski, Jerzy"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 11 z 11
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja A. J. Arberry: Aspects of Islamic Civilisation (As Depicted in the Original Texts), London 1964, s. 408Nosowski, Jerzy (Akademia Teologii Katolickiej w Warszawie. Wydział Teologiczny, 1966)Pozycja Frithjof Schoun. Comprendre l’Islam, Paris 1961, str. 220.Nosowski, Jerzy (Akademia Teologii Katolickiej w Warszawie. Wydział Teologiczny, 1963)Pozycja Herman Steiglecker, Die Glaubenslehre des Islam. 1 Lieferung Vortragen und spekulative Dogmatik, München 1959, str. 1-160; 2 Lieferung: Die geoffenbarte Dogmatik, München 1960, str. 161-320; 3 Lieferung: Die geoffenbarte Dogmatik, München 1961, str. 321-560; 4 Lieferung: Die geoffenbarte Dogmatik, München 1962, str. XXIV-561-834.Nosowski, Jerzy (Akademia Teologii Katolickiej w Warszawie. Wydział Teologiczny, 1963)Pozycja Koraniczne określenia i charakterystyki poza-arabskich wyznawców monoteizmu biblijnegoNosowski, Jerzy (Akademia Teologii Katolickiej w Warszawie. Wydział Teologiczny, 1969)In this essay the author presents some systematically and chronologically arranged texts of the Qurᶜān, where are contained names and characteristics of non-Arabic believers of the Biblical monotheism, these of Banu Israel (The Sons, the Children of Israel), Hādu, al-Yahūdū (the Jews), an-Nasārā (the Christians) and ahlu-l-kitābi (The Possessors, The People of the Book). The Jews and the Christians are shown in the contents of these texts as historical receivers of the Biblical revelation which had been commenced with Abraham and was continued with Moses and recently with Muhammad in the Qurᶜān. The anther of the Qurᶜān (Muhammad) esteems positively the original monotheism of Jews and Christians, but he accuses them for their inobedience towards the Divine Covenant and Commandments, for their sins and for their changement and even falsification of some revealed truths, especially for Jewish idolatry in Sinai and Christian belief in Jesus Son of Mary Divinity. In these Qurᶜānic declarations there are pointed out some quarrels and disputes among Jews and Christians which have to be resolved by the recent Qurᶜānic revelation and finally on the Doomsday (the Day of Last Judgment). There are prepared severe divine punishments for the Possessors of the Book who change the ancient revelations and who reject the revealed Qurᶜānic teaching. The original feature of this essay is the systatical arrangement of individual topics connected with separated terms concerning the non-Arabic believers of the Biblical monotheism and also the comparison of common elements perceived in talked about declarations. Owing to performed here analysis of respective Qurᶜānic texts, the author shows some ideological and religious premises for the genesis of Muhammad's and, later on, his political and religious successors' attitude towards the non-Arabic Possessors of the Bible who rejected the Qurᶜānic revelation. This special Muslim attitude is pretended to be the main cause of practical consequences in later history.Pozycja Problem uwierzytelnienia posłannictwa Mahometa w świetle KoranuNosowski, Jerzy (Akademia Teologii Katolickiej w Warszawie. Wydział Teologiczny, 1964)Pozycja Problem uwierzytelnienia posłannictwa Mahometa w świetle Koranu (c. d.)Nosowski, Jerzy (Akademia Teologii Katolickiej w Warszawie. Wydział Teologiczny, 1965)Pozycja Problem uwierzytelnienia posłannictwa Mahometa w świetle Koranu (dokończenie)Nosowski, Jerzy (Akademia Teologii Katolickiej w Warszawie. Wydział Teologiczny, 1966)Pozycja Stosunki między islamem a chrześcijaństwem w okresie istnienia imperium kalifówNosowski, Jerzy (Akademia Teologii Katolickiej w Warszawie. Wydział Teologiczny, 1973)Pozycja Wpływ apologetyki totalnej na badania religioznawczeNosowski, Jerzy (Akademia Teologii Katolickiej w Warszawie. Wydział Teologiczny, 1970)The application of the “total” method in the comparative apologetics of religions depends on previous statement of the mutual relations between the apologetics and other religious sciences. The “total” method in this respect consists in taking in account all three main psychological factors, namely the intellectual, the voluntary and the emotional one, in religious experience studies. The religious reality, that is, the experience of divinity, is analysed in such aspects by the psychology-, sociology- and history of religions. The comparative apologetics is one of the religious sciences and has its own material and formal object, which is the critical analysis of the psychological-, sociological- and historical genesis of any world great religious system in respect of its self defendene and accreditation. The specific method of comparative apologetics, namely the ’’total” method, enables getting acquainted with the genesis and development of any religious system which was created by concrete historical founder, religious leader or prophet. The successive stages of the “total” method of comparative apologetics are as follows: the critical analysis of historical (literary) sources concerning the genesis of searched religious system, then the study of the life, deeds and self defense of the founder or leader of given religious system, and at last the critical analysis of main arguments of his own accreditation system. This method is possible chiefly in studies of those religious systems, where previously the exsistence of such a religious founder or leader had been confirmed in history. The first attempt and experiment of application of the ’’total” method in comparative apologetics has been undertaken in studies of the genesis of Christian religion (The Religious Conscience of Jesus of Nazareth), the next one – in study of the Muhammadan religion, the Islam, both in the „Apologetical School" of the Theological Faculties in the University and Academy of Catholic Theology in Warsaw, Poland.Pozycja Występujące w Koranie nazwy transcendentnego przekaziciela treści tej księgiNosowski, Jerzy (Akademia Teologii Katolickiej w Warszawie. Wydział Teologiczny, 1967)This essay is a trial of comparative collection of some essential names concerning the transcendental transferrer of the Qur’anic contents that appear in this Book. The qur’anic texts quoted here in the new Polish translation performed by the author of this essay, contain the respective expressions which are submitted to the philological analysis and interpretation disregarding some ideas generally accepted by the qur’anic interpreters. There has been talked about here the ethymology and the doctrinal (theological) sense of some technical terms such as: du quwatin, du mirratin (The Lord 0/ Power, The Sovereign of Strength), ar-rasulu qarimun (The Honorable Apostle), at-tariqu (The Comer, The Knocker by Night), ar-ruhu (The Ghost), ar-ruhu-l-qudus (The Holy Spirit), ruhu-l-qudsi (The Spirit of Holyness), ar-ruhu-l-aminu (The Faithful, The Thrustworthy Spirit), Gibril (The Angel Gabriel), malakun (angel), al-mala’îkatu (angels), and there have been also shown some resemblances an differences of meaning between these terms. There has been considered also the question whether all the terms talked about here can be related objectively to one and the same person of the transcendental transferrer of the qur’anic contents, or whether the characteristic usage of them by the author of the Qur’an (Muhammad) has been an effect of subjective assotiations which could have emerged in his consciousness under the influence of the biblical ideology. There have been at last pointed out some difficulties connected with the researches which aim to any solution of this problem because of the insufficiency and obscurity of the qur’anic texts and also because of the lack of criticism from the part of non-qur’anic sources.Pozycja Y(ouakim) Moubarac, L’Islam, Casterman 1962, 213 s.Nosowski, Jerzy (Akademia Teologii Katolickiej w Warszawie. Wydział Teologiczny, 1966)