Przeglądaj wg Autor "Dobrzeniecki, Marek"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3
- Wyników na stronę
- Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Maciej Raczyński-Rożek. Dwie ręce Ojca. Chrystologia Ducha w ujęciu Hansa Ursa von Balthasara i Sergiusza Bułgakowa (Myśl Teologiczna 116. Kraków: WAM, 2024). Ss. 524. 62,90 PLN. ISBN 978-83-277-3909-4Dobrzeniecki, Marek (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2024)Pozycja Problem zła w teologii współczesnejDobrzeniecki, Marek (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II & Towarzystwo Teologów Dogmatyków, 2017)The paper tries to analyze the views of some of the contemporary theologians on the problem of evil. This problem for centuries was the most convincing argument of atheists in favour of the non-existence of God, and therefore the answers to this problem of today’s theologians are of great importance, especially in the context of the rationality of faith. The conclusion of the paper indicates that the most popular standpoint of today’s theology is the so called sceptical theism (agnosticism). The author argues also, that this point of view is alien to the theological tradition (especially to the theology of the Fathers of the Church) and he indicates at its weaknesses. The paper signals also, that the distinction: global and local evil could help theology in solving the current impasse.Pozycja The Metaphysics of the Incarnation in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy of ReligionDobrzeniecki, Marek (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, 2021)The paper presents the latest achievements of analytic philosophers of religion in Christology. My goal is to defend the literal/metaphysical reading of the Chalcedonian dogma of the hypostatic union. Some of the contemporary Christian thinkers claim that the doctrine of Jesus Christ as both perfectly divine and perfectly human is self-contradictory (I present this point of view on the example of John Hick) and, therefore, it should be understood metaphorically. In order to defend the consistency of the conciliar theology, I refer to the work of, among others, Eleonore Stump, William Hasker, Peter Geach and Kevin Sharpe. As a result, I conclude that recent findings in analytic metaphysics provide an ontological scaffolding that explains away the objection of the incompatibility of the doctrine of the hypostatic union. In order to confirm this conclusion such metaphysical topics as properties attribution (what it means for an object to have a property), relation of identity (what it means for an object x to be identical with object y), and essentialism and kind membership (what it means for an object to belong necessarily to a kind) are scrutinized in detail.

